+Chenthil Vel SEO Analyst Latest SEO News | Latest SEO Technique / Stategies [Updated 2019]

Latest SEO News Updates

Friday, 8 August 2014

Google introduced the webmaster and SEO world to a replacement ranking signal. Webmasters victimisation HTTPS (HTTP over TLS, or Transport Layer Security) to form their sites safer are looked upon additional favourably than people who don’t in Google’s program.
That’s to not say that HTTPS trumps everything else. In fact, the corporate indicated that it’s a fairly weak signal, a minimum of for currently. you'll expect it to grow in importance over time.
In a journal post, Google webmaster trends analysts Zineb Ait Bahajji and Gary Illyes same, ” For currently it’s solely a really light-weight signal — poignant fewer than one hundred and twenty fifth of worldwide queries, and carrying less we have a tendency toight than different signals like high-quality content — whereas we provide webmasters time to change to HTTPS. however over time, we have a tendency to might plan to strengthen it, as a result of we’d prefer to encourage all web site homeowners to change from protocol to HTTPS to stay everybody safe on the net.”
As you'll apprehend, Google’s algorithmic rule uses over two hundred ranking signals to see what search results to indicate users. even though this one is light-weight, simply however so much down on it list the signal really falls in terms of significance is anybody’s guess. maybe it’s not however one in all the foremost vital, however several of the opposite signals are not any doubt light-weight furthermore. And it’s infrequently that Google all out says that any explicit signal can probably increase in weight, therefore this can be one thing all webmasters higher concentrate to.
“Security could be a prime priority for Google. we have a tendency to invest lots in ensuring that our services use industry-leading security, like sturdy HTTPS secret writing by default. which means that individuals victimization Search, Gmail and Google Drive, as an example, mechanically have a secure affiliation to Google,” write Bahaji and Illyes. “Beyond our own stuff, we’re additionally operating to form the web safer a lot of broadly speaking. an enormous a part of that's ensuring that websites individuals access from Google ar secure. for example, we've got created resources to assist webmasters forestall and fix security breaches on their sites.”
That refers to Google’s Webmaster facilitate for Hacked Sites website, that helps people who are hacked come back to on course.

Wednesday, 21 May 2014

Google’s Matt Cutts announced on Twitter that they have released version 4.0 of the Google Panda algorithm.
Google’s Panda algorithm is designed to prevent sites with poor quality content from working their way into Google’s top search results.
But didn’t Google stop updating us on Panda refreshes and updates since they are monthly rolling updates? Yes, but this is a bigger update.
Panda 4.0 must be a major update to the actual algorithm versus just a data refresh. Meaning, Google has made changes to how Panda identifies sites and has released a new version of the algorithm today.
Is this the softer and gentler Panda algorithm? From talking to Google, it sounds like this update will be gentler for some sites, and lay the groundwork for future changes in that direction.
Google told us that Panda 4.0 affects different languages to different degrees. In English for example, the impact is ~7.5% of queries that are affected to a degree that a regular user might notice.
Source : http://searchengineland.com/google-begins-rolling-panda-4-0-now-192043

Friday, 16 May 2014

Matt Cutts Explains How Google Treats 404 and 410 Status Codes


First of all, Matt explains what a 404 and a 410 is. These refer to HTTP status codes; whenever a browser or Googlebot asks for a page, the website sends back a status code. For example, a status code of 200 means everything is fine, whereas a status code of 404 means the page was not found. And then there’s a 410, which means the page is permanently gone. Matt says Google does treat 404′s and 410′s a little differently, but for the most part you shouldn’t worry about it. Matt goes on to explain how these types of status codes are treated when crawled by Googlebot. If Google crawls a page and sees a 404, they protect the page for 24 hours in the crawling system in case the 404 was unintentional. If Google crawls a page and sees a 410, it’s assumed that status code is intentional because a webmaster would have had to manually go in and input the 410 code to indicate the page is gone. Rather than protecting a page with a 410, it’s treated as an error. Matt says Google still may go back the page is truly gone, but for the most part if you know the page is gone and not coming back it’s ok to serve a 410. If a page is gone, but may be coming back, it’s ok to serve a 404. Those are the basic differences, and Matt emphasizes a second time not to worry about them too much. Source from : http://www.searchenginejournal.com/matt-cutts-explains-google-treats-404-410-status-codes/101255

Wednesday, 30 April 2014

A quick reminder from Matt Cutts on the importance of content in the body of a page. The statement Matt Cutts made was that there is importance of content in the body of a page and not just the header, such as the title tag. If the title tag and meta data do not match the content in the body of the page on some level, that can confuse Google. Matt said make sure the stuff in the header is unique and great but make sure you pay attention to the body of your content ensuring it has unique and great content, as well. It is a very obvious point to most of our readers, but Matt answered this question in a very cute manner, i.e., with his body cropped out.

Saturday, 19 April 2014

Okay, I’m calling it: if you’re using guest blogging as a way to gain links in 2014, you should probably stop. Why? Because over time it’s become a more and more spammy practice, and if you’re doing a lot of guest blogging then you’re hanging out with really bad company. Back in the day, guest blogging used to be a respectable thing, much like getting a coveted, respected author to write the introduction of your book. It’s not that way any more. Here’s an example unsolicited, spam email that I recently received:

What is Google's view on guest blogging for links?

Does Google take action on spammy guest blogging activities?

How can I guest blog without it appearing as if I paid for links?

Friday, 31 January 2014

Many SEO Analyst people mainly considered the onpage factors are 1. Title Tag 70 characters without Special Characters. 2. Meta Descriptions contains 155 characters and keyword must be present at starting. 3. Meta Keywords contains maximum 5 keywords, This keywords must be present in the body content. ( Meta Keyword Tag is Optional ) 4. H1 Tag - This H1 Tag must be include page target keyword and H1 Tag must be appear in Top of the page look like SEO Browsers. Ex: www.browseo.net 5. Other Header Tags (H2, H3, H4) must be present a page in sequential order. 6. Body Tag must be contains minimum 30% Text for Customer informative. 7. Page must be contains Maximum 30% Keyword Density. 8. Maximum 50 Inner links are fine. 9. Every one webpage must be present in .xml & .html Sitemap 10. All images are required Alt Tag. 11. Title & Meta Description relevancy required for Minimum 85% 12. Every Webpage must be needed for 0 Broken links (404 Not Found Page error). 13. Every Webpage URL needed for keywords and with out space & Special characters. Above all points basically all SEO Analyst follow any website Onpage Optimization Technique.

Latest Technical Onpage Factors

The structured data testing tool lets you check your markup and make sure that Google can extract the structured data from your page. This tool will display the markup found on a specific web page, as well as a preview of how that page might appear in Google search results. You can also see examples of extracted markup for specific information types. If you've created rich snippets for a Google custom search engine, you can also use this tool to preview the results. View Sturctured Data Testing Tool

http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets.
Latest Technical Onpage Factors are Breadcrumb, Rich Snippet Customer Reviews & Ratings, Author Tag

Breadcrumb
Every webpages must be needed for Breadcrumb, It's very useful for Search Engine's and Customers to travel your website. It's one of the important Data Structuring factor in Onpage Optimization.
breadcrumb
Rich Snippet Customer Reviews & Ratings
Customer Reviews & Rating Snippet must be useful to your product category & Product details page. It's very useful for covered more customers to your website.
Rich snippet Rating & Reviews
Author Tag Author Tag is suitable for article type of webpages and Wordpress / News Updates / Press release type of webpages. Once your author tag is displayed famous person face related to your category page. It's very useful to increase CTR.
Author Tags

Saturday, 28 December 2013

There are 15 major changes are occurred in Google Algorithm target on SEO.
They are,

  • Unnamed Update — November 14, 2013
  • Penguin 2.1 (#5) — October 4, 2013
  • Hummingbird — August 20, 2013
  • In-depth Articles — August 6, 2013
  • Unnamed Update — July 26, 2013
  • Knowledge Graph Expansion — July 19, 2013
  • Panda Recovery — July 18, 2013
  • Multi-Week Update — June 27, 2013
  • Panda Dance — June 11, 2013
  • "Payday Loan" Update — June 11, 2013
  • Penguin 2.0 (#4) — May 22, 2013
  • Domain Crowding — May 21, 2013
  • "Phantom" — May 9, 2013
  • Panda #25 — March 14, 2013
  • Panda #24 — January 22, 2013

Panda #24 — January 22, 2013 This is this the first Google Algorithm update in 2013. Google announced its first official update of 2013, claiming 1.2% of queries affected. This did not seem related to talk of an update around 1/17-18 (which Google did not confirm).

Panda #25 — March 14, 2013 Matt Cutts pre-announced a Panda update at SMX West, and suggested it would be the last update before Panda was integrated into the core algorithm. The exact date was unconfirmed, but MozCast data suggests 3/13-3/14.

"Phantom" — May 9, 2013 In the period around May 9th, there were many reports of an algorithm update (also verified by high MozCast activity). The exact nature of this update was unknown, but many sites reported significant traffic loss.

Domain Crowding — May 21, 2013 Google released an update to control domain crowding/diversity deep in the SERPs (pages 2+). The timing was unclear, but it seemed to roll out just prior to Penguin 2.0 in the US and possibly the same day internationally.

Penguin 2.0 (#4) — May 22, 2013 After months of speculation bordering on hype, the 4th Penguin update (dubbed "2.0" by Google) arrived with only moderate impact. The exact nature of the changes were unclear, but some evidence suggested that Penguin 2.0 was more finely targeted to the page level.

"Payday Loan" Update — June 11, 2013 Google announced a targeted algorithm update to take on niches with notoriously spammy results, specifically mentioning payday loans and porn. The update was announced on June 11th, but Matt Cutts suggested it would roll out over a 1-2 month period.

Panda Dance — June 11, 2013 While not an actual Panda update, Matt Cutts made an important clarification at SMX Advanced, suggesting that Panda was still updating monthly, but each update rolled out over about 10 days. This was not the "everflux" many people had expected after Panda #25.

Multi-Week Update — June 27, 2013 Google's Matt Cutts tweeted a reply suggesting a "multi-week" algorithm update between roughly June 12th and "the week after July 4th". The nature of the update was unclear, but there was massive rankings volatility during that time period, peaking on June 27th (according to MozCast data). It appears that Google may have been testing some changes that were later rolled back.

Panda Recovery — July 18, 2013 Google confirmed a Panda update, but it was unclear whether this was one of the 10-day rolling updates or something new. The implication was that this was algorithmic and may have "softened" some previous Panda penalties.

Knowledge Graph Expansion — July 19, 2013 Seemingly overnight, queries with Knowledge Graph (KG) entries expanded by more than half (+50.4%) across the MozCast data set, with more than a quarter of all searches showing some kind of KG entry.

Unnamed Update — July 26, 2013 MozCast tracked a large Friday spike (105° F), with other sources showing significant activity over the weekend. Google has not confirmed this update.

In-depth Articles — August 6, 2013 Google added a new type of news result called "in-depth articles", dedicated to more evergreen, long-form content. At launch, it included links to three articles, and appeared across about 3% of the searches that MozCast tracks.

Hummingbird — August 20, 2013 Announced on September 26th, Google suggested that the "Hummingbird" update rolled out about a month earlier. Our best guess ties it to a MozCast spike on August 20th and many reports of flux from August 20-22. Hummingbird has been compared to Caffeine, and seems to be a core algorithm update that may power changes to semantic search and the Knowledge Graph for months to come.

Penguin 2.1 (#5) — October 4, 2013 After a 4-1/2 month gap, Google launched another Penguin update. Given the 2.1 designation, this was probably a data update (primarily) and not a major change to the Penguin algorithm. The overall impact seemed to be moderate, although some webmasters reported being hit hard.

Unnamed Update — November 14, 2013 Multiple Google trackers picked up unusual activity, which co-occurred with a report of widespread DNS errors in Google Webmaster Tools. Google did not confirm an update, and the cause and nature of this flux was unclear.